Legal Opinion
Hempel v. Cydan Development, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 24, 2020No. 8:18-cv-03404Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ADDISON HEMPEL, et al., * Plaintiffs, * Case No. PX-18-3404 v. * CYDAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is the motion to compel (“Motion”) (see ECF Nos. 114 & 125 at 11-13) filed by Defendants Cydan Development, Inc, et al.1 Having considered the submissions of the parties (ECF Nos. 114, 125, 140 & 145), the Court finds that a hearing is unnecessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Thursday Special Grand Jury September Term, 1991. United States of America v. Under Seal Under Seal, and Under Seal Under Seal, in Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Thursday Special Grand Jury September Term, 1991. United States of America v. Under Seal Under Seal, and Under Seal Under SealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.