Legal Opinion

Roser v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1991No. 2-91-0297PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company, Inc. (GEICO), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Thomas C. Roser, who was GEICO’s insured. GEICO asserts that the court erred in finding as a matter of law that section 143a — 2(2) of the Illinois Insurance Code (the Insurance Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 73, par. 755a — 2(2)) did not relieve GEICO of the obligation to offer plaintiff additional uninsured motorist coverage in 1989 when plaintiff renewed his policy of insurance with GEICO and increased his limits of bodily injury liability coverage…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. AlejosIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. HaywoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. SingletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Luciano v. Waubonsee Community CollegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Cummings v. City of WaterlooAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Patel v. Illinois State Medical SocietyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. ESG Watts, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Burrows v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API