Legal Opinion

Cummings v. City of Waterloo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 24, 1997No. 5-96-0546PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

Plaintiffs, Mark Cummings, et al., appeal from an order of the Monroe County circuit court dismissing their complaint against defendant, the City of Waterloo (the City) for failure to state a cause of action. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), was allowed to intervene and was made a defendant in the proceeding below and is also a participant in this appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause for the reasons set forth below.

FACTS

On June 17, 1996, the city council of the City passed ordinance number 1013 by a simple majority of the council. In ordinance number 1013 the City…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lagen v. Balcor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Toombs v. City of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Roser v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Wieseman v. Kienstra, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Union National Bank v. Village of GlenwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. City Suites, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. KitzmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. North v. HinkleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Safeway Insurance v. DaddonoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Environmental Control Systems, Inc. v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API