Brimberg v. Commissioner of Finance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*299Dismissal of the article 78 proceeding was appropriate where petitioner’s exclusive remedy for the allegedly improper assessment of his property was a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law (see Kahal Bnei Emunim & Talmud Torah Bnei Simon Israel v Town of Fallsburg, 78 NY2d 194, 204 [1991]; see also Matter of Brimberg v Commissioner of Fin. of City of N.Y., 45 AD3d 506 [2007] [involving petitioner’s challenge to the 2003/2004 tax rolls]).
Petitioner’s challenges to the methodology employed by respondents in assessing recently renovated properties in tax class one are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Emunim v. Town of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Board of Managers of Greens of North Hills Condominium v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Brimberg v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rokowsky v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fair Assessment Committee, LLC v. New York State Office of Real Property ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009