Legal Opinion

Harris v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 25, 1952No. 10481_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

After extended preparation by the respective parties, two consolidated preferred stockholder class suits against the defendant railway company and its board of directors were, on the eve of trial, settled by written contract of the parties, agreeing that all claims of plaintiffs and their class asserted in the complaints had been fully adjudicated and settled. Following the agreement, the trial court entered a consent judgment finding, among other things, that the actions were proper class suits; that plaintiffs adequately represented all members of the class; that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Zimmerman v. Chicago Great Western R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Institutionalized Juveniles v. Secretary of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API