Torossian v. Hayo
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motion, the plaintiffs’ opposition, defendants’ reply, and the record in this case, the Court grants the motion and enters summary judgment in favor of the defendants.
I. FACTS
On October 16, 1995, one of the largest public demonstrations in the nation’s history was held on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Between half a million and a million demonstrators, predominantly African-American men, are estimated to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Josiah Haynesworth and Fred Hancock v. Frank P. Miller, Chief, Law Enforcement Section, Office of the Corporation Counsel, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dodge v. Trustees of the National Gallery of ArtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008