Legal Opinion

State v. Balsam

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 16, 1981No. 2 CA-CR 2337PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pled guilty to unlawful use of a means of transportation, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1803 (an open-ended offense). He was placed on probation for three years upon several terms and conditions. One condition was that he reimburse the state for extradition costs in the amount of $853, to be paid within two years with the monthly payment schedule to be set by the probation department. Appellant challenges the trial court’s authority to impose this condition of reimbursement. We find no merit in his position.

A.R.S. § 13-901(A),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State v. GeldenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LackNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. PalmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Maroney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. RyythSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API