Legal Opinion

Nalen v. Jenkins

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1987No. 16646PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This appeal arises from an award of attorney fees under § 48-608(3) of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act. Craig and Katherine Nalen, the appellants, contend that the award was unreasonably small. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion in calculating the amount awarded. For reasons explained below, we vacate the award and remand the case.

A review of the facts and proceedings is in order. Craig and Katherine Nalen contracted with Edward Jenkins, doing business as American Homes, for the purchase and construction of a log home. The Nalens…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warren v. LeMayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Associates Northwest, Inc. v. BeetsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Decker v. Homeguard SystemsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. DeWils Interiors, Inc. v. DinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. M & W GEAR CO. v. AW Dynamometer, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Irwin Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Israel v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. White v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kelly v. HodgesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Meldco, Inc. v. Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API