Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is a petition filed in the Superior Court for the assessment of damages for the alleged taking of land of the petitioner. Upon the facts to which the parties agreed the trial judge subject to the plaintiff’s exception found and ruled that the taking was invalid and reported the case to this court upon the following terms: “If the *162Supreme Judicial Court should decide that the taking was not valid, the petition is to be dismissed without costs; otherwise the action is to stand for trial.” The land in dispute is on Main Street near the center of Medford. On October 11, 1927, the board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Inhabitants of Watertown v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Radway v. Selectmen of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Butchers' Slaughtering & Melting Ass'n v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Inhabitants of Blackstone v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Burnham v. Mayor & Aldermen of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Chandler v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API