Legal Opinion

United States v. Fell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2007No. 06-1438PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendanh-Appellant, Nathaniel J. Fell, entered a guilty plea to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). A Presen-tence Investigation Report (“PSR”) recommended that Fell be sentenced as an armed career criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Fell objected to the recommendation, arguing his prior Colorado state conviction for conspiracy to commit second degree burglary is not a violent felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). The district court concluded the Colorado conviction qualifies as a violent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. Jimenez RecioSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Larry BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. DeiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. People v. RandellColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. United States v. ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API