United States v. Fell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Defendanh-Appellant, Nathaniel J. Fell, entered a guilty plea to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). A Presen-tence Investigation Report (“PSR”) recommended that Fell be sentenced as an armed career criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Fell objected to the recommendation, arguing his prior Colorado state conviction for conspiracy to commit second degree burglary is not a violent felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). The district court concluded the Colorado conviction qualifies as a violent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Jimenez RecioSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Larry BegayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DeiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- People v. RandellColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- United States v. ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.