Legal Opinion

United States v. Willis

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 26, 1973No. 25,766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Judge:

Article 27, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827, provides in part that no person “who has acted for the prosecution may act later in the same case for the defense.” On this appeal, the accused contends that this prohibition against inconsistent representation was violated, notwithstanding appointed defense counsel’s averment at trial that he had not “so acted.”

Captain J. F. Motley was the appoint*113ed trial defense counsel. His first appearance for the accused, however, occurred about a month earlier. The accused had requested counsel for the Article…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. AlbrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DowtyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API