Wolf and Klar Cos. v. Garner
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Defendant Garner d/b/a The Hock Shop (Garner) appeals a judgment in favor of plaintiff Wolf & Klar (Wolf) on its open account claim, and the award of attorney fees to Wolf. Garner also alleges error in the trial court’s finding that defendant’s conduct amounted to constructive fraud. Garner affirmatively argues that plaintiff could have avoided the loss and, consequently, it should not have been awarded relief in equity. We affirm the trial court’s decision.
1.Background.
In 1977, Garner commenced purchasing jewelry items from Wolf, a partnership engaged in diamond…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leitensdorfer v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Heron v. GaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Home Savings & Loan Association v. BatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- GCM, Inc. v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Moody v. StriblingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.