Legal Opinion
Moody v. Stribling
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1999No. 18,875PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Tom and Martha Stribling appeal from a judgment in favor of Jane Moody finding that they breached their fiduciary duty to Jane and awarding her $324,604 in damages. They raise the following issues on appeal: (1) Jane was not the real party in interest; (2) the district court committed reversible error by failing to join necessary parties; (3) the district court improperly found that Tom and Martha owed Jane a fiduciary duty; (4) if Tom and Martha owed Jane a fiduciary duty, substantial evidence does not support that Tom and Martha breached that duty; (5) the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Calkins v. Cox EstatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Ex Rel. King v. B&B Investment Group, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Insure New Mexico, LLC v. McGonigleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Presbyterian Healthcare Services v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- New Mexico State Board of Psychologist Examiners v. LandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.