Burns v. Spiker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Jackson district court; George H. Whitcomb, judge, pro tern.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by ■
MASON, J.:
Sarah E. Burns, the widow of John T. Burns, brought this action against his four children by a former wife, and other defendants, the principal purpose being to procure a division of his estate under the law of descents and distributions instead of according to the terms of a written ante-nuptial agreement and a will to which she had given her consent in writing, both of which instruments she claims to be invalid. Judgment was rendered against her and she appeals.
1. The plaintiff contends that the provisions of the ante-nuptial contract are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Bacus v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- McMahill v. McMahillIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Rosenberg v. LipnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- In Re Estate of AntonopoulosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- First National Bank v. Ten NapelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- In Re Estate of NeisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.