Legal Opinion

Powell v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided September 27, 2006No. 10-02-00358-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

FELIPE REYNA, Justice.

A jury convicted Michael Powell of evading arrest in a vehicle, elevated by a prior evading arrest conviction to the level of a third degree felony. We must determine whether evading arrest on foot is a lesser-included offense of evading arrest by vehicle. 1 Because we will conclude that no rational trier of fact could have found that Powell did not use a vehicle during part of his flight from the officer, we will affirm.

An offense is a lesser-included offense if it is: (1) “included within the proof necessary to establish the offense charged”; and (2)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrimonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Enrique Sanchez Salazar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Charles Ralph Bull, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. Donald Lewis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  5. Duke Energy Field Services, LP v. Glendell Meyer, Rose Marie Meyer, and Eddith M. Hinkle, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API