Legal Opinion

State v. Painter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 13, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOTT, Judge.

The appellants, Mr. Painter and Mr. Valentine, were each convicted of armed robbery and received life sentences in the penitentiary. Mr. Valentine was also convicted of aggravated assault and received a sentence of not less than four nor more than ten years in the state penitentiary, to run concurrently with the armed robbery sentence. Aggrieved by their convictions, they have appealed. The appellant, Mr. Painter, raises four issues for our review and Mr. Valentine raises three.

In Mr. Painter’s first issue he questions whether it was error for the trial court to admit his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Eddie Huless Gilpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BurtisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  2. Carl P.E. Munsey v. John Howerton, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  3. State v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API