Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Miller

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1984Published

1DissentFones, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I agree with Sections I, II and the first grammatical paragraph of Section III of the majority opinion.

But, I agree with defendant’s contention that the interrogation techniques employed by Officers Winston and Ailor that includ*285ed misrepresentation and deception at the jail in Ohio, were psychologically coercive, that the confession was improperly influenced and involuntary and that the taint of that interrogation rendered the Knoxville interrogation and confession inadmissible.

The Miranda court, noting that coercion can be mental as well as physical, examined the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API