Legal Opinion

Eddie Huless Gilpin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1969No. 26172PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

Miranda requires, as a minimum, that law enforcement officers give certain specific warnings to an accused before a confession may be deemed voluntary. 1 Failure of the interrogating officers to give all of the Miranda-bundle of warnings will destroy the voluntariness of the confession. The courts must therefore dissect a custodial warning to see if all parts are present, properly composed, and add up to adequate notice of an accused’s pre-confession right. Here, failure of a police officer to warn an accused that he is entitled to an attorney during an interrogation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Kenneth George MontosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Commonwealth v. HaasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Schade v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API