Legal Opinion

Wetmore v. Dean

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1905No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Mason; McAlvay, J.' Assumpsit by Frank E. Wetmore against Charles M. Dean for the amount of¡a judgment. Plaintiff had judgment in the justice’s court, and defendant appealed to the circuit court by writ of certiorari.There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment in justice’s court against defendant. The case was removed to the circuit court by certiorari, where the judgment was reversed. The case is brought here by writ of error. There were a good many reasons assigned in the affidavit for the writ why the judgment should be set aside. An inspection of the record shows that each of these reasons was fully answered by the return of the justice. This return must be regarded as conclusive. Young v. Kelsey, 46 Mich. 414; Rawson v. McElvaine, 49 Mich. 194; Mann v. Tyler, 56 Mich. 564; People v. Hux, 68 Mich. 477. We think,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rawson v. McElvaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Mann v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People v. HuxMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Young v. KelseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henika v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API