Legal Opinion
United States v. Rausch
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 13, 2008No. 1:07-cr-00497PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON SENTENCING
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order corrects the erroneous reference to supervised “parole” on pages 21 and 23 of the Memorandum Opinion and Order on Sentencing issued yesterday, August 12, 2008. The correct reference to supervised “release” has been substituted for both occurrences.
I
Introduction
The defendant Ralph Rausch (Rausch) has plead guilty to a one count Information charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), Possession of Child Pornography. The statutory penalty is not more than ten years…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Alfred J. Rioux, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Munoz-NavaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. RauschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SternDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- United States v. RauschDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- United States v. KravetzDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013