Legal Opinion
United States v. Rausch
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 30, 2011No. 10-1388PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Ralph Rausch appeals from his sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release, contending that the district court denied him his right to allocution at sentencing by never asking him personally whether he would like to speak before imposition of sentence. Because Mr. Rausch cannot demonstrate plain error warranting reversal, we AFFIRM.
I. BACKGROUND
On January 31, 2008, Mr. Rausch pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). See United States v. Rausch, 570 F.Supp.2d 1295, 1296…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Bustamante-ConchasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Martini (Cassesse)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TurriettaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.