Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1937No. 8349PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District Court restraining defendant from the use of a copyrighted trade-name upon the grounds of trade-mark infringement and unfair trade. The decree orders an accounting.

The plaintiff (appellee), the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a corporate citizen of New Jersey with principal place of business in New York, brought this action in the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division, (defendant residing therein) alleging in its bill of complaint that its trademark “Eight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patterson v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  3. Queen Mfg. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Chesebrough Mfg. Co. v. Old Gold Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  5. American Products Co. v. American Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patricia J. Kothe v. Dr. James W. Smith, Dr. Andrew D. Kerr, Jr., M.D., P.C., and Andrew D. Kerr, Dr. James W. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. v. American Aviation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. F. W. Fitch Co. v. Camille, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Time, Inc. v. T.I.M.E. Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. Consolidated Cosmetics v. Neilson Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API