Cherry v. Seymour Bros.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COUCH, Judge.
Here appellants question whether an improperly captioned notice of action to nullify a Health Claims Arbitration award satisfies the statutory procedures of the Health Care Malpractice Act if it is factually determined that appellants “were in no manner prejudiced” by the error. Since, in our view, appellees’ filing of the notice of action to nullify fully complied with statutorily prescribed procedures for invoking judicial review, we need not address the role, if any, the prejudicial effect of noncompliance plays in this statutory scheme. We affirm the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Crowe v. HouseworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Tranen v. AzizCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Levy v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Sugarloaf Citizens Assoc., Inc. v. GudisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Ott v. Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Chia Chuen Su v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.