Legal Opinion
Tranen v. Aziz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 2, 1985No. 120, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
We shall here determine the procedures an aggrieved party must follow to obtain judicial review1 of an arbitration award under the Health Care Malpractice Claims Act.
The facts are not in dispute. Mrs. Pearl Tranen and her husband, appellants, filed a claim in the Health Claims Arbitration Office against Barbara S. Aziz, M.D., Patuxent Medical Group, P.A. and Columbia Medical Plan, Inc., appellees, for Dr. Aziz’s alleged negligent failure to diagnose breast cancer in Mrs. Tranen. After hearing the Tranens’ claim, the Health Claims Arbitration Panel made an award in favor of Dr.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Tranen v. AzizCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
3Cited by30 opinions
- Theodore R. Bledsoe, M.D. v. Brian Crowley, M.D. v. Sylvia Friedman, M.DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Lewis v. WaletzkyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Alden v. Harpers Ferry Police Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Columbia Road Citizens' Ass'n v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Ott v. Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.