Legal Opinion
Jones v. Griffith
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 25, 1988No. Civ. F 88-10PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Carol Jones, has filed a motion for a preliminary determination under I.C. 16-9.5-10-1 which presents a number of important issues under Indiana law. Defendant Griffith has filed a motion to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Both motions are fully briefed and the court heard oral argument on May 23, 1988. 1 To expedite matters, the court will deal both with the defendant’s motion to dismiss and the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary determination in this order.
I
Factual…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Billy Wayne Broyles, Linn M. Broyles v. Herman D. Bayless, Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Carol Jones, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jon W. Jones, Deceased v. Harold W. Griffith, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Griffith v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Griffith v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.