Legal Opinion

Altman v. Munns

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1986No. 8610DC56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant contends that the facts as found by the trial judge do not support the conclusions of law and, in fact, compel the opposite conclusions. The facts were not in dispute and the trial judge found them essentially as outlined above. From these facts, the trial court concluded:(5) The Defendant has breached the terms of the Separation Agreement and is indebted to the Plaintiff, Mary Elaine Altman, in the sum of $3,110.96, and is indebted to the Plaintiff, Lisa Elaine Munns, in the amount of $2,270.04.(6) The Plaintiff, Mary Elaine Altman’s, acceptance of a fait accompli in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clifford v. River Bend Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. H. M. Wade Manufacturing Co. v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Yamaha International Corp. v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Industrial Lithographic Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berry v. WORLDWIDE LANGUAGE RESOURCES, INC.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
  2. Lewis v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. LiebenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Brumley v. Mallard, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Aym Techs., LLC v. RodgersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API