Legal Opinion

Danielewicz v. Arnold

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2001No. 1198, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND G. THIEME, Judge,

Retired, Specially Assigned.

Patricia Danielewicz appeals from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County’s decision granting appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Appellant presents the following questions for our review, which we have rephrased for clarity:

1. Whether the trial court erred by determining that appellant lacked standing to sue both in her own capacity and derivatively for the corporation for claims against an officer and director of a corporation for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, civil conspiracy, and aiding and abetting.

2. Whether the trial…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. John P. Kennedy v. Venrock AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Shenker v. Laureate Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Shoen v. SAC Holding Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mitchell v. AARP Life Insurance ProgramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Strougo v. BassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API