Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Grover

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1946No. 7275PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiffs (respondents) for partition of real property. (Title 9, Chapter 5, I.C.A.). Defendants (appellants) demurred to the complaint, which was overruled, and, as a separate and affirmative defense, allege, “that the only effective way for an adjustment of the matter is by an order directing the sale of said properties involved and a division of the proceeds.”

Appellants and respondents are joint tenants of Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 427, Townsite of Pocatello. The Bunga low Court Apartments, consisting of four distinct brick buildings, each of which is 30 x 140…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hurt v. Monumental Mercury Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hill v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Morton Realty Co. v. Big Bend Irrigation & M. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Merrill v. Fremont Abstract Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Newport Water Co. v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hawkins v. Teeples and Thatcher, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Pearson v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hawkins v. Teeples and Thatcher, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API