Legal Opinion

Brown v. Windhom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1991No. 9010DC1234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s Rule 60 motion to set aside the judgment. We affirm, finding no *220error in the trial court’s conclusion that it was unreasonable for defendant to delay almost a year before filing the motion.

On 17 November 1987, plaintiff Herman Brown brought an action against defendant L. H. Windhom, d/b/a Windhom Brothers. Plaintiff sought rescission of a contract and alternatively sought relief for breach of contract. Defendant’s attorney at that time, Paul White, from Pitt County, timely filed an answer to the complaint. Pursuant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City Finance Co. of Goldsboro, Inc. v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Nickels v. NickelsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. McLean v. Phil MechanicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API