Legal Opinion

McLean v. Phil Mechanic

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1994No. 9330SC849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiff filed two causes of action against defendant: first, an action for criminal conversation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and punitive damages; second, a claim for slander and punitive damages. The two cases were consolidated for trial. The trial court entered a default against defendant in the action for slander and denied defendant’s motion to set aside the default. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, or in the alternative, for sanctions against plaintiff for violating N.C.R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) by pleading punitive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Hawkins v. HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. L. Harvey and Son Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. SweattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re L.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. D.G. II, LLC v. NixCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API