Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 2010No. 08-16472PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.

OPINION

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Terrell McNeal (“Petitioner”) appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.

Petitioner argues that because his counsel was not present at the hearing on the prosecution’s motion to compel a DNA sample, Petitioner was deprived of counsel at a “critical stage” in the proceedings and his conviction must be reversed without inquiry into prejudice. We issue this opinion to clarify the difference between a stage at which the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Doody v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Alexander Michael RoyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Montes-Lopez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Betschart v. Washington County Circuit Court JudgesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Bladimir MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API