Ohm v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a suit in equity instituted against the city of San Francisco and a large number of private parties, for the purpose of obtaining a decree ordering, adjudging, and declaring,— 1. That-the plaintiff is the successor in interest of one Peter T. Scherrebeck, and, as such, the equitable owner of a tract of land eight hundred varas square, situated in the heart of the city; 2. That the United States, in conveying the premises to the city and county of San Francisco, did so in trust for the plaintiff, thereby imposing upon said city and county the duty of conveying the same to him; 3. That…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Henshaw v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Lynch v. BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Palmer v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Monahan v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.