Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1985No. S-458PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a negligence claim against the state. Freeman alleged the state is liable for negligent failure to institute dust control procedures on the Dalton Highway. The trial court concluded the state is immune from tort liability under the discretionary function immunity exception to the Tort Claims Act. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Dalton Highway is a 374 mile dirt and gravel road running from the Yukon River bridge to Prudhoe Bay, built and maintained at one time by Alyeska Pipeline Service Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Johnson v. Alaska State Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API