Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 25, 1941No. 1052PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWINFORD, District Judge.
On December 6, 1933, C. J. Redmon, doing business under the name of Redmon Heating Company, was awarded a contract by the United States Government to do a certain part of the construction work on a Government project in Roanoke, Virginia. Under the terms of the statute, Redmon on December 13, 1933, executed bond to the Government for the performance of his contract. 40 U.S.C.A. § 270. On February 23, 1934, Redmon exercised an optional provision in the contract and executed a second bond.
The bonds provided that the contractor, “shall faithfully make payment to all…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- In Re D & B Electric, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1980
- The Bank of Arizona, a Corporation v. National Surety Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harvard Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Midtown Bank of Miami v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company v. Riverside BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.