Legal Opinion

Hartung v. State, Department of Labor

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2001No. S-8352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska law allows the state, under certain circumstances, to collect a corporation's unpaid unemployment taxes from the officers of the delinquent corporation. A corporate officer is liable for all payments that become due during a period in which the officer is in a position to behave strategically and effectuate the payments. But where bankruptey intervenes and removes the corporate officer's power to make the required payments on behalf of the corporation, that officer is not liable for payments that become due during the post-petition period and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Belcufine v. AloeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Bruner v. PetersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Marion Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guercia v. AON Affinity Insurance Services IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025
  2. Hartung v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Nicole Zimmerman v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  4. State v. HooverIdaho Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API