Legal Opinion

In Re Heile

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1939No. 5561 & 5562PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

The appellees in these cases were found guilty of contempt by a notary public in refusing to answer certain Questions asked them at the taking of their deposition. They were committed to the custody of the sheriff until they should purge themselves of the contempt. Whereupon, petitions for writs of habeas corpus were filed.

At the hearing before the court, it was considered that they were not in contempt and were unlawfully restrained of their liberty, and the sheriff was directed to release them from custody. The sheriff appealed from that order.

Appellees’ counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neugass v. Terminal Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Waldmann v. WaldmannOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Lemley v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API