Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Turner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1986No. 50278PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This appeal arises from the grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee.

Appellant Charlotte Turner is the named insured in a homeowner’s policy with appellee Nationwide. At issue is the scope of coverage provided under the policy.

Appellant Charlotte Turner brought an action against the estate of her deceased son-in-law, Carol Higgins, for wrongfully causing the death of her husband, Roland Turner. Appellee Nationwide sought a declaratory judgment that it was not obligated to defend Carol Higgins’ estate because he was not an “insured” under the terms of the policy with Charlotte…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Duke v. Sanymetal Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. American Centennial Insurance Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1995
  4. WEST AMERICAN INS. CO. OHIO v. McGheeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of America v. BoughtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API