Legal Opinion

Sarracino v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1974No. L.A. 30309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

13 Cal.3d 1 (1974)

529 P.2d 53

118 Cal. Rptr. 21

ERNEST JAMES SARRACINO, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; DOROTHY DARLINGTON SARRACINO et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Docket No. L.A. 30309.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 3, 1974.

COUNSEL

Huston T. Carlyle for Petitioner.

John H. Larson, County Counsel, and Robert C. Lynch, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondent.

A. Tod Hindin and Hindin & McKay for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

WRIGHT, C.J.

Petitioner Ernest James Sarracino seeks a writ of mandate to compel vacation of orders rendered against him…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API