Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. White Motor Credit Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 27, 1986No. 3-83-0036PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, Chief Judge.
This case arises under 15 U.S.C. § 1989, and involves claims arising from the sale of a used truck by White Motor Credit Corporation (“White Motor”) to Frank Mitchell. Defendants White Motor Credit Corporation and Nortran, Inc., d/b/a El Dorado Trucks (“Nortran”) move for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claims against them, asserting (1) that the odometer disclosure requirements contained in section 408 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1988, and section 3 of the Arkansas Odometer Regulation Act, Ark.Stat.Ann. § 75-2403, are…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Orca Bay Seafoods v. Northwest Truck Sales, Inc. Kamco, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Jensvold v. Town & Country Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.