Legal Opinion
Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. v. Espy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1995No. 93-16977PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must delve into one of the more byzantine, and all-encompassing, areas of federal administrative regulation — that governing fruits and vegetables. In the process, we decide whether various regulations governing the size, maturity, and advertising of California tree fruits are arbitrary and capricious or otherwise in violation of the rights of those who handle and process the fruits.
I
Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc. and other growers, handlers, and processors of tree fruits in California (collectively “the handlers”) challenge various regulations contained in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Crawford v. LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Bonnichsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- ASSE International, Inc. v. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Leathers v. Gulf Rice Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.