Legal Opinion

Doullut & Ewin, Inc. v. Seabury

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1928No. 1 Div. 474PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An injury to the knee is an injury to the leg, and, there being only a 10 per cent. permanent disability, plaintiff was entitled to only seventeen and one-half weeks' compensation. There having been paid seventeen weeks of this compensation, he is only entitled to one-half week more. Code 1923, § 7551, subd. C, par. (a); Ex parte Diniaco Bros., 207 Ala. 685,93 So. 388; Rogers v. Modern Brotherhood, 131 Mo. App. 353,111 S.W. 518; Code 1923, § 7598, subd. L; Casey-Hedges Co. v. Lynch,147 Tenn. 173, 245 S.W. 522; Galloway Coal Co. v. Stanford,215 Ala. 79, 109 So. 377.

Inge Bates, of Mobile, for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sprowl v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  2. Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Ex Parte A. Diniaco & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Ex Parte Jefferson Slag Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Burnett v. RomanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Ford v. Crystal Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Wilborn Construction Company v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API