Doullut & Ewin, Inc. v. Seabury
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
An injury to the knee is an injury to the leg, and, there being only a 10 per cent. permanent disability, plaintiff was entitled to only seventeen and one-half weeks' compensation. There having been paid seventeen weeks of this compensation, he is only entitled to one-half week more. Code 1923, § 7551, subd. C, par. (a); Ex parte Diniaco Bros., 207 Ala. 685,93 So. 388; Rogers v. Modern Brotherhood, 131 Mo. App. 353,111 S.W. 518; Code 1923, § 7598, subd. L; Casey-Hedges Co. v. Lynch,147 Tenn. 173, 245 S.W. 522; Galloway Coal Co. v. Stanford,215 Ala. 79, 109 So. 377.
Inge Bates, of Mobile, for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sprowl v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Galloway Coal Co. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Ex Parte A. Diniaco & Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte Jefferson Slag Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Burnett v. RomanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Ford v. Crystal Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Nolan v. Ernest Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Wilborn Construction Company v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968