Legal Opinion

Burkholder v. Fonner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Hall county. Tried below before Harrison, J. • cited: Butler v. Kennard, 23 Neb., 359; Nicholas v. Jones, Id., 816; Anderson v. Cox, 16 Id., 10.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

The plaintiff in error brought suit in the district court to recover the sum of $500 as compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by him in the sale of certain real estate owned by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

John Fonner, in 1885, owned a farm in Hall county, consisting of 880 acres, which he leased to the plaintiff and his two brothers for that year at a cash rental. In the month of February, 1886, the defendant traded the farm, with other lands, to one Levi Cox, for a stock of goods.

The testimony introduced on behalf of the plaintiff tends to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norwood v. Alamo Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Johnson v. DysertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Miller Cattle Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Dorgeloh v. MarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Hambleton v. FortNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API