Legal Opinion

Hambleton v. Fort

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1899No. 8795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Lincoln county. Tried below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

Fort sued nambleton to recover $125 as commissions earned as real estate broker in procuring a purchaser for land owned by Hambleton in Lincoln county. He recovered judgment for $96, and tbe defendant bas brought the case to this court by proceedings in error. The first question raised, and tbe principal one in tbe case, is tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence. Tbe contract as alleged was to find a purchaser or sell the land, but there is no proof *283of authority' to mate a sale, and it is clear that plaintiff did not himself effect the sale, so the question is, did he perform such services…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Burkholder v. FonnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. McMurtry v. MadisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Albers v. ZieglerNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Trent Trust Co. v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API