Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos Arturo Arango, Simeon Rojas-Lopez and Sixto Mario Arango, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 1988No. 86-5635, 87-5538PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Senior District Judge:
The defendants, Carlos Arturo Arango (Carlos), Simeon Rojas-Lopez (Simeon), and Sixto Mario Arango (Sixto), appeal their convictions on one count of conspiracy to manufacture cocaine 1 , two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine 2 , and one count of manufacturing cocaine. 3 The defendants have raised five issues on appeal. We affirm.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. The Trial
The evidence at trial would warrant the jury's finding the following facts:
Between March 14th and 16th, 1986, Metro-Dade police officers and various Drug Enforcement Administration…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Donald TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Laboy-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rachel Lee PadgettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Ronald Duane Beaulieu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.