Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 30, 2005No. 1:04-cv-00042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VINING, Senior District Judge.

This action, alleging wrongful denial of disability insurance benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., is before the court on the plaintiffs “Motion For Statutory Penalties under 29 U.S.C.A. § 1132(C)(1)” [Doc. No. 76],

I. Procedural Background

The court summarized the pertinent facts of this case in a prior order dated October 6, 2005 [Doc. No. 75], In this court’s prior order, the court dismissed as moot the defendant’s motion to strike certain exhibits that were submitted by the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jimmie Ruth Daughtrey v. Honeywell, Inc., Bull Hn Information Systems, Talent Force, Inc., AKA Temp ForceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Brucks v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  3. Hamall-Desai v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bragg v. ABN AMRO North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Poole v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
  3. Williamson v. Travelport, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API