Goodwin v. Durant Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
¶ 1 When applied to the case’s facts the Uniform Commercial Code’s [Code or U.C.C.] provisions, as adopted in Oklahoma, 1 provide a complete panoply of rules to determine the issues presented. In this instance it is unnecessary to supplement the Code’s provisions with the common law.
I
PROCEDURAL FACTS AND HISTORY
¶ 2 After the Durant Bank & Trust Company [Bank or seller] acquired a Case backhoe (model 580K) through foreclosure, 2 it sold the same to Goodwin [buyer]. Upon the sale’s consummation, Goodwin ordered a repair manual. When buyer received this booklet, he realized for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Perry v. Lawson Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Associates Financial Services, Inc. v. MillsapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Carpet World, Inc. v. RiddlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Ranger Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.