Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Durant Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1998No. 86764PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

¶ 1 When applied to the case’s facts the Uniform Commercial Code’s [Code or U.C.C.] provisions, as adopted in Oklahoma, 1 provide a complete panoply of rules to determine the issues presented. In this instance it is unnecessary to supplement the Code’s provisions with the common law.

I

PROCEDURAL FACTS AND HISTORY

¶ 2 After the Durant Bank & Trust Company [Bank or seller] acquired a Case backhoe (model 580K) through foreclosure, 2 it sold the same to Goodwin [buyer]. Upon the sale’s consummation, Goodwin ordered a repair manual. When buyer received this booklet, he realized for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Perry v. Lawson Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Associates Financial Services, Inc. v. MillsapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Carpet World, Inc. v. RiddlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. COMANCHE NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. COFFEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Ranger Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API