Carpet World, Inc. v. Riddles
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The primary issue for decision is whether an appellate court can render the judgment the trial court should have rendered where the party-defendant has not been afforded an opportunity to present its evidence before the trial court. We answer in the negative.
Having reached a conclusion that the Court of Appeals judgment was incorrect, we must then address the effect of our finding on the award of costs and attorney fees rendered below.
Gerald G. Riddles (Buyer) and his wife, entered into a contract with Carpet World, Inc., (Seller), for the purchase of $2,335.19 worth of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Geb v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Associates Financial Services, Inc. v. MillsapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Goodwin v. Durant Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Leck v. LeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Cunningham v. Public Service Co. OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.