Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Canty
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1998No. 98-133PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Kathe Campbell (Kathe) was initially treated by Dr. Charles R. Canty (Dr. Canty) after she was severely bitten by a donkey. Kathe and her husband, Ken, (collectively referred to as “the Campbells”) filed a complaint against Dr. Canty alleging negligence in his care and treatment of Kathe. Trial was held in the District Court for the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County, wherein the jury found that although Dr. Canty was negligent in his care of Kathe, Dr. Canty’s negligence did not cause injury to Kathe. We affirm.
¶2 The Campbells raise the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Whether…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jim's Excavating Service, Inc. v. HKM AssociatesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Tanner v. Dream Island, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
- Rocky Mountain Enterprises, Inc. v. Pierce FlooringMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of Investigative Records of City of Columbus Police Dept.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lester Ammondson v. Northwestern CoMontana Supreme Court · 2009
- Ammondson v. Northwestern Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Missoula v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Upky v. Marshall Mountain, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- D.R. Four Beat Alliance, LLC v. Sierra Production Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.