Legal Opinion
ATL, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 6, 1984No. 442-83CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:
Question Presented
The question presented by this ease is whether or not plaintiff received a fair hearing incident to its suspension from eligibility to receive any contracts with the United States pending the completion of an investigation and any ensuing legal proceedings.
Facts
In ATL, Inc. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 259 (1983), the court held that the Navy’s slowdown in the consideration of plaintiff’s low bids on four Honolulu construction contracts over a period of more than four months without a hearing, in anticipation that plaintiff might be charged with…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Atl, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atl, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Harris Systems International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Sterlingwear of Boston, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.