Arnell v. Salt Lake County Board of Adjustment
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
¶ 1 Plaintiff Jason P. Arnell asserts that he is entitled to just compensation from Defendants Salt Lake County Board of Adjustment (the Board) and Salt Lake County (the County) 1 (collectively referred to as the County) under federal takings jurisprudence. Alternatively, Plaintiff argues that he is entitled to rescind his land purchase contract with Defendant Truman G. Madsen (Madsen). The trial court, granted summary judgment in favor of all Defendants and denied Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against Defendants. We reverse and remand the trial court’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Salt Lake City Mission v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Geonan Properties, LLC v. Park-Ro-She, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Tolman v. Logan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Uintah Mountain RTC, L.L.C. v. Duchesne CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.